|
HISTORICAL SKETCH OF THE ATTEMPT TO OVERTHROW THE REPUBLIC
BY
THE ADHERENTS OF LILIUOKALANI IN JANUARY, 1895
COMPILED BY WALLACE W.
FARRINGTON
CHAPTER 1
Rise And Fall Of The
Rebellion
The unfriendly attitude
of the American Administration toward the Republic and the withdrawal of
the United States
man-of-war from the Honolulu harbor early in September, gave the
adherents of Liliuokalani, who sought to re-establish Monarchical rule
in the Islands, renewed assurance that theirs might be a winning cause
and the spirit of conspiracy became so thoroughly established that a
number of private detectives were kept in the employ of the Marshal of
the Islands watching those who were suspected as possible leaders in a revolutionary
movement. During the closing weeks of the year 1894, the evidence
obtained by the police department made the government apprehensive of
trouble, though just what form it would take, and to place the leaders
in the movement was beyond the power of the officials. Many supporters
of the government were disposed to criticize the Marshal as being
unnecessarily cautious, but as subsequent events showed, it was by the
untiring vigilance of Marshal Hitchcock that the most deep seated, and
if successful, the most disastrous revolution the country has ever
known, was nipped in the bud, the plot laid bare and the plotters
brought to justice.
With the first days of
the year 1895 came daily and steadily increasing evidence of an attempt
to overthrow the Republic. The keeper of the lookout station on Diamond Head reported that he had been requested not to signal the
arrival of the steamer Waimanalo off the harbor. On Thursday night, Jan.
3rd, a mysterious gathering of natives was broken up at Kakaako on the
water front of the city. On the following Saturday night a large number
of natives were noticed coming into the city from the outlying
districts, and saloons, generally crowded with natives and half-whites
on Saturday evenings, were well nigh deserted.
Sunday afternoon,
January 6, 1895, the Marshal received positive information of a
gathering of natives and the location of a quantity of arms at the house
of Henry Bertlemann, about five miles from the city on the road running
around the base of Diamond Head. Deputy Marshal Arthur M. Brown was sent out to watch the
place and note those going and coming. About five o'clock in
the afternoon Captain Robert Parker, senior captain of the police and a
squad of native police were sent out with a warrant to search the
premises. Arriving near the house they found it guarded and were fired
on as they approached. This was an unexpected reception and they
retreated.
Charles L. Carter,
Alfred Carter, James B. Castle and A. L. C. Atkinson, who were living at
Waikiki, heard the firing and armed with rifles, ran quickly toward the
Bertlemann place to render aid. They met Deputy Marshal Brown with
Captain Parker and the police at the entrance of the lane leading from
Kapiolani Park.
Mr. Atkinson was sent to town with a message, and with its reinforcement
the party again returned toward the Bertlemann house. They met no
resistance on entering the yard and proceeded to the house where they
found Bertlemann in the sitting room, quietly reading.
Deputy Marshal Brown
entered the house, made known his mission, and at the request of
Bertlemann read the search warrant. Meanwhile other members of the party
went around the house. As Mr. Carter and Mr. Castle approached the canoe
shed, which is perhaps twenty-five feet from the house toward the sea,
they saw forms in the shed and Mr. Carter rushed toward the entrance
followed by Mr. Castle and Alfred Carter. Firing immediately began,
Charles Carter being wounded in the breast. On entering the shed he fell
and at that time undoubtedly received the fatal shot in the abdomen.
The firing became
general, the native police being engaged with a number of the rebels
firing from a clump of trees. Those in the canoe house quickly scattered
and ran up the beach, firing as they went. The two men captured by the
police were taken into the house and with Bertlemann placed under guard.
Charles Carter, who was
by this time suffering from most agonizing pain, was laid on a bed in
the house. The two native police, Holi and Logan who had been wounded in
the scrimmage were also taken into the house where the small searching
party stood watch over the prisoners and awaited assistance from the
town.
The news that fighting
was going on at Waikiki reached town between half past seven and
eight o'clock while a large proportion of the people wore at the evening
services of the churches. Marshal Hitchcock realizing that he had
trouble of a serious nature on his hands called out the Citizens' Guard,
the military was also ordered to rendezvous and within two hours of
sounding the first alarm, the government had fully one thousand men
under arms guarding the streets of the city.
A Cabinet meeting was
immediately called at the police station and the advisability of
declaring martial law discussed. There was a decided difference of
opinion which resulted in an adjournment till the morning. Meanwhile a
party of regulars under Lieut. King was sent to the Bertlemann house,
and with the volunteer companies at their posts of rendezvous and the
Citizens' Guard patrolling the streets the government waited for
developments. Little or nothing was known of the plans or extent of the
uprising. It was apparent the rebels had arms and plenty of them, but as
to the number gathered at Diamond Head, their leaders and organization, the prospect of armed bands
of men attacking the city from other directions, or the possibility of
an uprising in the town with mobs fighting in the streets, the
government knew nothing. The threatened outbreak had come come and the
government must be prepared to meet force with force, was the epitome of
the situation Sunday night, January 6th.
The government forces
consisted of two companies of regulars, five of volunteers, including a
company of Sharpshooters, the Citizens' Guard, native police and mounted
patrol, in all aggregating about 1200 men. All but the Citizen's Guard
were armed with regulation Springfield
or Winchester rifles, the members of the last organization furnishing
their own arms. The Citizens' Guard having a regular company
organization under Capt. F. B. McStocker, was subject to orders from the
Marshal or Attorney-General as an emergency auxiliary of the police
department.
Death Of Carter
The right of writ of
habeas corpus is hereby suspended and Monday morning, January 7th, at
5:30 o'clock, Charles L. Martial Law is instituted and established
throughout the Carter died from wounds received in the fight of the
previous Island
of Oahu, to continue until further notice, during which night. This was
a sad and unexpected blow to the community as it had been generally
reported that his injuries were not of a serious nature. The funeral
occurred on the afternoon of the same day. Charles Lunt Carter, the
eldest son of H. A. P. and Sybil A. Carter, was born in Honolulu,
November 30, 1864. His early education was obtained in schools of his
native country, after which he attended the Michigan School of Law at
Ann Arbor, graduating in 1887. He returned to Honolulu and became
prominent in legal and political circles, and in 1893 was a member of
the Commission sent to Washington to petition the annexation of the
Islands to the United States. He was prominent in framing the
Constitution of the Republic, and at the election of 1894 was elected
representative to the Legislature from the Fourth District of Oahu.
Martial Law Declared
In the early morning of
the 7th, preparations were made to attack the force of rebels. The
Cabinet held an early session and the following proclamation of Martial
Law was issued:
EXECUTIVE BUILDING,
HONOLULU, January 7, 1895
The right of writ of habeas corpus is hereby
suspended and Martial Law is instituted and established throughout
the Island of Oahu, to continue until further notice, during which
time, however, the Courts will continue in session and conduct
ordinary business as usual, except as aforesaid.
By the
President, SANFORD B. DOLE, President of the Republic of Hawaii.
J. A. KING,
Minister of the Interior
It became evident that
the active force of the rebellious element was entrenched at Diamond
Head, and parties were sent out to make attacks by way of Waikiki, the
Moiliili road and from the sea. The government field pieces backed up by
the sharp musketry proved effective in driving the rebels toward the top
of Diamond Head where they were located when the night of the 7th fell.
Within the city of
Honolulu
business was practically suspended, nearly all the clerks and heads of
the business houses being on guard in the city or in the field. No
steamers or vessels were allowed to depart, and a strict guard was kept
all along the water front. About noon the Marshal began to arrest the
men prominent in the Royalist cause, and by nightfall about twenty had
been put in prison, including Charles Clark, who was known as one of the
"hangers on" of the ex-Queen since the overthrow, and who proved a
valuable witness for the government.
At the time of his
arrest, a large assortment of arms nine rifles and five pistols of the
finest workmanship were taken from Washington Place. Mrs. Dominis had
left her residence early in the morning and with Mrs. Nowlein, one of
her attendants, had gone to Ewa.
During the afternoon of
January 7th, several of the rebels were captured, and from them it was
learned that the insurgents were under the command of Robert Wilcox and
Samuel Nowlein, with Carl Widemann, W. H. C. Greig and Louis Marshall as
Lieutenants. Wilcox had received military instruction in Italy during
the days of King Kalakaua, and had always displayed a revolutionary turn
of mind, having been the leader of the fiasco of 1887. Samuel Nowlein
served in the military under the Monarchy, and after the overthrow of
1893 had lived at Washington Place as a retainer of the ex-Queen.
Widemann was the son of Judge H. A. Widemann, one of the ex-Queen's
Commissioners to President Cleveland. Greig and Marshall were young
clerks in business houses of Honolulu.
With the exception of Marshall all these men were half-caste Hawaiians,
the latter being of American parentage. Their followers were made up
principally of natives and half-castes who had been day laborers about
the city.
Early
on the morning of the 8th, it was discovered that the rebels under cover
of darkness and by reason of their superior knowledge of passes in the
mountains, had escaped from Diamond Head and were endeavoring to mass their forces in one of the
valleys back of Honolulu Startling rumors from the Ewa district to the
effect that a filibuster party was landing near Waianae led to the
dispatch of a detail from the Sharpshooters under Capt. J. A. King on
the steamer Claudine to cruise about the threatened district. The story
proved to be a canard, and the party returned early in the evening.
Another expedition by water was made under command of Hon. H. P. Baldwin
on the steamer Ke Au Hou to ascertain the condition of affairs on the
other Islands, it having been rumored that an uprising would take
place on Maui,
simultaneously with that in Honolulu. This expedition returned on the
evening of the 9th, having found everything quiet on the other Islands.
The movements of the
military companies were centered on an endeavor to locate the rebel
forces, and prevent their escape beyond the confines of the valleys back
of the city. It soon became evident that the rebel leaders had little
control over their men whose principal desire was to get away from the
fighting front. On the afternoon of Wednesday, a lively skirmish was
precipitated by an attempt to surround some of Wilcox's men in Manoa
valley. This resulted in one rebel killed, one wounded, two taken
prisoners and the final escape of the principal part of the band into
Pauoa valley. The advantage of the rebels lay in their familiarity with
the passes in the sharp mountain ridges that separate the valleys and
the ability of the native to pick his way through the lantana thickets,
which to the white man are practically impenetrable. By Wednesday night
it was very apparent that so far as any offensive movement on the part
of the rebels was concerned, the fighting was finished. Men taken
prisoners told of days and nights in the mountains without food or
shelter. They had been armed with Winchester
carbines and a good portion of the men had no idea how to manipulate the
guns, much less do effective work with them.
From this time on the
efforts of the government forces were expended in capturing the rebel
leaders, Wilcox, Nowlein, Widemann, Marshall, Greig and Lot Lane.
Arrests among the whites in and about the city were constantly being
made by virtue of the evidence drawn from those taken prisoners in the
field and arrests made in the city. It was clear to the conspirators
that the government was receiving correct information, which fact caused
not a little consternation in the ranks of upwards of two hundred men
who were imprisoned during the first two weeks of the rebellion.
January 14th was a
notable day. In the forenoon, Nowlein, Widemann, Greig and Marshall
surrendered themselves to the authorities, and during the afternoon
Robert Wilcox was captured in the outskirts of the city. The men were
haggard and worn and appeared thankful to escape with their lives.
Feeling among the government supporters was at highest tension and it
was generally demanded that the leaders of the insurrection suffer the
death penalty. The murder of Charles Carter and the anarchist plan of
attack, which, if carried out, must have resulted in the indiscriminate
death of women and children accentuated this feeling, and again, it was
believed that stern measures would put an end to the series of
periodical political imbroglios from which the country had suffered
during the past ten years.
Arrest Of Liliuokalani
Although it was the
general impression that ex-Queen Liliuokalani was thoroughly conversant
with every preliminary move in the plot to overthrow the Republic, and
was in fact a co-conspirator, the government officials, although keeping
a close watch on the woman, refrained from putting her under arrest
until unquestionable evidence was obtained connecting her with the
affair. On the forenoon of January 16th, Deputy Marshal Brown and Senior
Captain Parker of the police force served a military warrant on the
ex-Queen at her Washington Place residence. She offered no protest and
accompanied them to the Executive Building, where she was taken into
custody by Lieut. Col. J. H. Fisher, commanding the military forces and
placed under guard in one of the commodious rooms of her former palace.
Mrs. Charles Wilson accompanied her as an attendant and all possible was
done to insure her comfort in the new quarters. The evening of the same
day, Captain Parker and Deputy Marshal Brown accompanied by Charles
Clark as a guide, searched the premises and unearthed a small arsenal
consisting of eleven pistols, thirteen Springfield rifles, twenty-one
Winchester rifles, five swords, thirty-eight full belts of pistol
cartridges, one thousand loose cartridges and twenty-one dynamite bombs.
A number of the bombs were made of cocoanut shells filled with giant
powder, but the greater proportion were iron shells filled with giant
powder and small bird shot, with cap and fuse ready for immediate use.
These, with the draft of a new Constitution and Commissions for
officials of the government that was to be instituted, left no doubt as
to the knowledge of the ex-Queen Liliuokalani of the plans of the
revolutionists.
CHAPTER 2
Trial Of The Political
Prisoners
The problem of bringing
the political prisoners to justice was a matter entailing quite as much
careful thought a*id discretion, as unearthing the plot of the
conspirators, and putting down the rebellion. The prisoners anticipated
little more consideration than would be received at the hands of a
drum-head court martial, but notwithstanding the government was firm in
its determination to impress upon them the serious nature of the crime
committed, there was no disposition to administer punishment with
radical haste or without due attention to the testimony of each
defendant. Under advisement of the Executive and Advisory Councils,
President Dole, by the constitutional authority vested in him as
Commander-in-chief of the armed forces, caused to be issued on January
16th, an order for a Military Commission "to meet at Honolulu, Island of
Oahu, on the 17th day of January, A. D. 1895, at 10 A. M., and
thereafter from day to day for the trial of such prisoners as may be
brought before it on the charges and specifications to be presented by
the Judge Advocate."
The officers of the
Court were:
Colonel William Austin
Whiting, First Regiment, N. G. H.
Lieutenant-Colonol J.
H. Fisher, First Regiment, N. G. H.
Captain C. W. Ziegler,
Company F, N. G. H.
Captain J. M. Camara,
Jr., Company C, N. G. H.
Captain J. W. Pratt,
Adjutant, N. G. H.
Captain W. C. Wilder,
Jr., Company D, N. G. H.
First Lieutenant J. W.
Jones, Company D, N. G. H.
Captain William A.
Kinney, Aide-de-Camp on General Staff, Judge Advocate.
Colonel Whiting and
Captain Kinney were commissioned as officers of the National Guard under
an act passed by the Advisory Council authorizing the Commander-in-Chief
to fill vacancies by appointment during martial law. Mr. Whiting was a
Judge in the Circuit Court and Mr. Kinney a member of the Honolulu bar
who had assisted the Government in obtaining evidence against those
implicated in the uprising. The other members of the Commission were
regularly elected line officers of the military forces and had been
members of the National Guard since its organization in 1893.
The trials were held in
the Legislative Hall of the Executive building and were open to the
general public, special accommodations also being made for the
attendance of the diplomatic corps. No restrictions were placed upon the
press of the country, except that no comments on the conduct of the
trials or the testimony offered was allowed.
The first men brought
before the Commission were Henry F. Bertelmann, W. Lane, James Lane,
Carl Widemann, W. H. C. Greig, Louis Marshall, Robert W. Wilcox and Sam
Nowlein, charged with "Treason, by abetting, procuring, counselling,
inciting and aiding others to commit treason, and to engage in open
rebellion against the Government of the Republic of Hawaii, and by
attempting by force and arms to overthrow and destroy the same, and by
levying war against the same." The prisoners were allowed counsel, Paul
Neumann acting as the leading attorney throughout the trials. Other
lawyers who appeared as counsel at different times, were Antone Rosa, S.
K. Ka-ne, J. Kaulukou and Jas. A. Magoon.
One of the first moves
of the counsel was to raise objection to the jurisdiction of the
Commission on the following grounds: "That no military or other law
exists in the Hawaiian Islands under which a Military Commission is
authorized to try any person for a statutory crime. That under the
proclamation of martial law the general authority of the Courts of the
Republic created by the Constitution continues, and they have authority
to conduct all business which comes properly before them, and have the
sole authority to try persons accused of offenses such as are specified
in the charges before the Commission."
Lawyer Neumann, in
defending his objection, called attention to the fact that the limit of
martial law is in the Commander-in-Chief. If such was the case, then the
accused were not given the rights allowed under the Constitution. He
claimed that the Military Commission had no right to try a crime
committed against the Republic of Hawaii, which had Civil Courts in
which fair trial would be given. The accused had a right to appeal to
the country and its laws. There was nothing to show that the Commission
had any right to act unless it showed the exigency. The rebellion was a
thing of the past.
The Judge-Advocate
stated that martial law is a law of necessity, in which the question of
necessity rests in the discretion of the Executive and nobody can call
it in question. The right had been exercised; there was nothing more to
say.
Referring to the
section of the order which allowed the Courts to proceed with routine
business, Captain Kinney said, "Sound common sense clearly shows what
the intention was, and no man need err therein, though a fool." He
refused to argue whether the Executive exercised the right of law
judiciously.
Answering the objection
that the rebellion had been put down and no actual hostilities existed,
Captain Kinney said, " God knows whether they do or not. No one knew
whether they did when men hurried from their beds on the night of
January 6th No man is yet assured of where we stand."
The Commission
overruled the objection and the trial proceeded. Bertlemann, Wilcox and
Nowlein pleaded guilty to charges and specifications. The others
declined to plead on advice of counsel. The Government's case was
strengthened by confessions made by Samuel Nowlein, organizer of the
military rebel forces; Henry Bertleman, at whose house the first
outbreak 'occurred, and Captain Davis, George Townsend and Charles
Warren, who assisted in landing arms. The trial of these eight leaders
in the field was completed on Saturday the 19th. With the exception of
Nowlein and Bertlemann each of the prisoners went on the witness stand
and made statements as to their connection with the rebellion. The
counsel for the defense made a strong plea for clemency of the
prisoners, most of whom were Hawaiian born. Judge-Advocate Kinney in his
argument laid great stress on the fact that the time and opportunity had
come to put an end to the biennial uprising to which the country had
been subjected. Those representing and supporting the present and only
lawful government demanded a fair, just and reasonable decision at the
hands of the Commission. None of the findings of the Commission were
made public till the trials were completed.
On Monday, January
21st, the Commission began the trial of Charles T. Gulick, William H.
Rickard, Thomas B. Walker and William T. Seward. These men were among
the prime movers of the revolt, although they took no part in the open
hostilities. Gulick and Seward were of American parentage, the latter
having served in the Union forces during the War of the Rebellion.
Gulick was a descendant of one of the prominent missionary families; was
a member of the Honolulu liar and took an active part in politics under
the Monarchy, serving at one time as Minister of the Interior. Rickard
and Walker
were of English parentage, the former being at one time numbered among
the well-to-do sugar planters of the country. Of late years he had lost
heavily and was practically bankrupt. Walker was a contractor and
builder, who, after the down-fall of the Monarchy, gave quite as much
attention to plotting against the Government as to his business affairs.
These four organizers
of the rebellion were called to answer to the charge of treason. Gulick,
Seward and Rickard plead not guilty to each charge and specification.
Walker
pleaded guilty to the specifications charging him with aiding and
abetting rebellion and procuring munitions for the insurgents.
The trial of these four
men lasted four days, during which time the witnesses for the Government
laid bare the plot of the rebellion, over which these men had
practically acted as supervisors.
Among the witnesses who
gave the most damaging evidence were Nowlein and Bertlemann, Captain
Davies, captain of the Steamer Waimanalo which was used in landing the
arms; John Cummins, with whom "Major" Seward had lived during the
greater part of his residence in the islands, and William F. Kaae, who
had acted as private secretary to Liliuokalani during her residence at
Washington place.
The evidence presented
showed that Seward had made a trip to San Francisco in December of 1894,
procured the arms and ammunition and arranged for shipment to Honolulu.
Rickard had assumed the task of looking after the arms on their arrival.
Gulick acted as legal adviser, having assisted in drafting the
Constitution and Cabinet Commission for the new Government.
Walker,
besides being an all round instigator, had provided for the manufacture
of dynamite bombs which were to be used in the street fighting. To him
had been assigned the task of leading the forces that were to attack the
police station. Statements to this effect were made by Walker himself,
who went on the stand as a witness in order to protect members of his
family from being brought before the commission as witnesses.
On the last day of the
trial Gulick made a written statement in which he denied having taken
any part in or having any knowledge of the plottings against the
Republic. It was proved conclusively however, that he had not only
drafted the constitution, and forms for cabinet commissions and martial
law orders, but meetings of the leaders had been held at his house and
he had been in close touch with nearly every move of the royalists in
their plans to overthrow the Republic. The evidence submitted by the
prosecution was so complete, that, beyond the statement of Gulick the
defense had very little to offer. As in the previous cases, the plea of
the defense was for clemency. The Judge-Advocate in his closing
arguments on the case, drew attention to the manner in which these men
of intelligence had pushed the ignorant native into the brunt of the
fight, having been careful to screen their own connection with the
affair in case of the failure of the natives, but ready at the first
evidence of success to come to the front and claim the glory. As for the
sympathy of the accused for the natives, the Judge Advocate held that if
their sympathy had led them to put fire brands in the hands of the
natives it should have led them to go to the field and exercise a
controlling hand. "Carter lost his life through the lack of control of
the natives; certainly these leaders should have thought of the women or
children in the town who would be exposed to the same danger. There was
nothing manly, nothing patriotic, except possibly among the natives who
went blindly to the front. The criminal act of the accused was worse
than that of pirates, as they were not on the pirate deck."
On the afternoon of
the' 23d of January, the first lot of natives, twelve in number,
captured in the field was brought before the court on the charge of
treason. The principal defense of these men as well as the majority of
the rank and file of the insurgents who were brought before the court
later, was that they had been forced into the fight by the foreign and
half white leaders. While it is true that they were willing participants
and were possibly inspired by a feeling of loyalty to the ex-Queen, had
they been less under the influence of liquor, better aware of the
enormity of the crime committed and the punishment to which they were
liable on account of their action, it is highly probable that they would
have withheld from joining the insurgent forces. The trials of the
natives were slow and tedious, nearly every prisoner being enthused with
a desire to question witnesses and make lengthy statements of their
connection with the uprising. A second lot of thirteen natives was
brought into court on the evening of Thursday the 24th, their trial
continuing through the week.
The first man to be
placed on trial for Misprison of Treason was John F. Bowler, a
contractor and builder of Honolulu,
who has always been quite prominent in politics. Counsel Neumann at the
opening of this case made a strong fight against the jurisdiction of the
Court, additional objections to those presented at previous trials being
offered as follows:
First. That there
is no actual state of war in the country.
Second. That the
proclamation of martial law does not authorize the trial of any
person by a Military Commission, or a Court Martial, unless he is a
member of the Military or Navy of this country or, if actual war
exists, that he has committed an offense against the laws of war.
Third. The crime of
which the prisoner is accused is Misprison of Treason, a statutory
crime which, by its definition under the law, is not an offense
against the laws of war.
Fourth. That under
the Constitution and laws of the Republic of Hawaii the prisoner is
entitled to a trial by jury upon information, indictment and
complaint, except in cases of impeachment.
Judge-Advocate Kinney
marked the usage of martial law as different times as follows:
First. "The law
martial exercised by the constable and marshal over troops in active
service."
Second. "The same
system in time of peace or emergency and especially for punishment
for the breaches of the peace."
Third. "For the
government of standing armies under the Mutiny Act and the Army
Discipline Act."
Fourth. "The common
law right of the crown and its representatives to repel force by
force in case of rebellion or insurrection and to act against rebels
as it might against invaders."
This trial and those
for Misprison of Treason that were to follow came more correctly under
the second definition.
''Under the
Constitution of Hawaii the President may not only suspend the writ
of habeas corpus; he may not only declare martial law; he may place
the whole or any part of the Republic under martial law; not only in
case of rebellion or insurrection, but when there is imminent danger
of rebellion or insurrection and the public safety requires. He may
not only use the military force to suppress an insurrection and
during its actual continuance; he may use military force and martial
law for the prevention of any recurrence or repetition of an
insurrection, that is to say, while there is " imminent danger" of
it, and if he may govern the country under such circumstances by
martial law for any purpose, he may do so for all purposes.
''The Hawaiian law,
unlike English and American law, authorizes the establishment and
continuance of martial law in time of peace as well as war. It may
be, also, that the prisoner has, by his crime, made himself liable
before the Civil Courts of the country if they were now performing
their functions in cases of this nature. There is no inconsistency
in the same conduct being punishable as well by municipal as by
martial law, or in the same act, being criminal, as well by
municipal as by martial law. Today each and every provision of the
Constitution of Hawaii which conflicts with martial law is
superseded by the martial law, which is supreme today. The mere
suspension of the writ of habeas corpus might, perhaps, imply that
the civil processes would subsequently apply in any case not
strictly a war case; but the Hawaiian Constitution goes further than
to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and makes martial law, and
nothing but martial law, now supreme upon the island of Hawaii
today."
Mr. Kinney closed by
stating that it was due only to a rule of law that Bowler was not
charged with treason. The Commission overruled the objections to its
jurisdiction in this as in the preceding cases.
The evidence brought
out in the two days' trial showed that Bowler had been aware of the plot
of the insurgents, and to him had been delegated the capture of the
telephone offices. The non-arrival in the city of Nowlein's forces was
apparently all that prevented his taking an active part in the fighting.
Bowler, however, made a statement asserting his innocence and ignorance
of all plans and intentions of the insurgents.
On the afternoon of
January 29, the trial of Volney V. Ashford for Misprison of Treason was
opened. Outside the trial of the ex-Queen this was one of the hardest
fought legal battles of the trials. The defense endeavored to break down
the evidence of Samuel Nowlein who, it was understood, was to be one of
the principal witnesses against Liliuokalani. All attempts in this
direction were futile, however, it being shown that Ashford had acted as
one of Nowlein's advisors and was conversant of the proposed outbreak.
V. V. Ashford had always been active in politics, and with his brother
C. W. Ashford, was always known as a rebellious spirit. He had been
prominent in military circles during the reign of the Monarchy, and at
one time was forced to leave the country for his participation in
political plottings. After the overthrow he returned and immediately
became affiliated with the royalist cause.
The most prominent
persons brought before the Court from this on were ex-Queen Liliuokalani
and Jonah Kalanianaole commonly known as "Prince Cupid." Their trial
will be dealt with more fully in succeeding chapters. Outside these the
time of the Commission was taken up principally with the trial of
natives who had been connected with the affair, either as active
participants in the field or guards and messengers during and previous
to the outbreak.
The trial of the last
case brought before the Commission ended March 1. The Commission did not
adjourn sine die, however, until March 18, when all the men against whom
the government held serious charges had left the country, and many who
had been imprisoned during the outbreak were released.
During its session of
thirty-six days, 191 prisoners were brought before the Commission. Of
the 176 prisoners charged with treason five were acquitted, and in the
cases of sixty-four, notably the natives on guard at Washington Place
and witnesses who turned States evidence, sentence was suspended. Only
two of the fifteen charged with Misprison of Treason were acquitted.
The first of the
sentences were made public on February 12, when a number of natives
found guilty of treason were sentenced to five years imprisonment at
hard labor. A few days latter followed the sentences of Volney V.
Ashford and John F. Bowler, convicted of Misprison of Treason, Ashford
being sentenced to one year's imprisonment with $1,000 fine, and Bowler
to five years' imprisonment and $5,000 fine. On Saturday, February 23,
the sentences of the leaders were published as follows: Charles T.
Gulick, W. H. Seward, Robert Wilcox, Samuel Nowlein and Henry
Bertlemann, each thirty-five years' imprisonment at hard labor, with a
fine of $10,000. The Military Commission had sentenced these men to
suffer the death penalty, which sentence was commuted by the President
as above. Sentences were suspended in the cases of Nowlein and
Bertlemann, they having given important evidence. The other leaders
sentenced were: T. B. Walker, thirty years and $5,000 fine; Carl
Widemann, thirty years and $10,000 fine; W. H. C. Greig, twenty years
and $10,000 fine; Louis Marshall, twenty years and $10,000 fine. The
ex-Queen was sentenced to five years' imprisonment with $5,000 fine and
Jonah Kalanianaole, commonly known as "Prince Cupid" to one year with
$1,000 fine. J. A. Cummins received the same sentence as ex-Queen
Liliuokalani but was released on payment of fine. The sentences of the
others who were mostly natives and half castes, ranged all the way from
five months to five years imprisonment, the fine, as a rule, being
stricken out by the President.
CHAPTER 3
Abdication And Trial Of
Liliuokalani
When it became apparent
that all hopes of the restoration of ex-Queen Liliuokalani had been
irretrievably blighted, it became general! y rumored that the ex-Regent
was prepared to make a formal abdication of her claims as the only
lawful ruler of the people of Hawaii
a claim to which she had adhered most tenaciously from the day of the
overthrow. During her detention in the Executive Building she was in
constant touch with her friends and advisers, through her agent Charles
B. Wilson, who was allowed free access to her apartments by the military
authorities.
On the afternoon of
January 24th, the members of the Cabinet were informed that the ex-Queen
had an official document which it was desired should be presented to the
Executive.
They signified their
willingness to listen to any communication which the now military
prisoner might submit. During the latter part of the day a copy of the
following correspondence was put in the hands of Attorney-General Smith.
The letter was drawn by Judge A. S. Hartwell who had been consulted by
Messrs. Wilson, Parker and Neumann regarding the matter, and acted as
advising counsel for them. Judge Hartwell also attended the execution of
the document:
ISLAND OF OAHU,
HONOLULU, Jan. 24, 1895
To THE HON. SANFORD
BALLARD DOLE, President of the Republic of Hawaii:
SIR: After full and
free consultation with my personal friends and with my legal
advisors, both before and since my detention by military order in.
the Executive building, and acting in conformity with their advice,
and also upon my own free volition, and in pursuance of my
unalterable belief and understanding of my duty to the people of
Hawaii, and to their highest and best interests, and also for the
sake of those misguided Hawaiians and others who have recently
engaged in rebellion against the Republic, and in an attempt to
restore me to the position of queen, which I held prior to the 17th
day of January, A. D. 1893, and without any claim that shall become
entitled, by reason of anything that I may now say or do, to any
other or different treatment or consideration at the hands of the
Government than I otherwise could and might legally receive, I now
desire to express and make known, and do hereby express and make
known, to yourself, as the only lawful and recognized head of the
Government, and to all the people of the Hawaiian Islands, whether
or not they have yet become citizens of the Republic, or are or have
been adherents of the late monarchy, and also to all diplomatic and
other foreign representatives in the Hawaiian Islands, to all of whom I respectfully request you to cause
this statement and action of mine to be made known as soon as may
be, as follows, namely:
First. In order to
avoid any possibility of doubt or misunderstanding although I do not
think that any doubt or misunderstanding' is either proper or
possible, I hereby do fully and unequivocally admit and declare that
the Government of the Republic of Hawaii is the only lawful
Government of the Hawaiian Islands, and that the late Hawaiian
monarchy is finally and forever ended, and no longer of any legal or
actual validity, force or effect whatsoever; and I do hereby forever
absolve all persons whomsoever, whether in the Hawaiian Islands or
elsewhere, from all and every manner of allegiance, or official
obligation or duty, to me and my heirs and successors forever, and I
hereby declare to all such persons in the Hawaiian Islands that I
consider them as bound in duty and honor henceforth to support and
sustain the Government of the Republic of Hawaii.
Second. For myself,
my heirs and successors, I do hereby and without any mental
reservation or modification, and fully, finally, unequivocally,
irrevocably, and forever abdicate, renounce and release unto the
Government of the Republic of Hawaii and the legitimate successors
forever all claims or pretensions whatsoever to the late throne of
Hawaii, or to the late monarchy of Hawaii, or to any past, or to the
existing, or to any future Government of Hawaii, or under or by
reason of any present or formerly existing constitution, statute,
law, position, right or claim of any and every kind, name or nature
whatsoever, and whether the same consist of pecuniary or property
considerations, or. of personal status, hereby forever renouncing,
disowning and disclaiming all rights, claims, demands, privileges,
honors, emoluments, titles and prerogatives whatsoever, under or by
virtue of any former, or the existing Government, constitution,
statute, law or custom of the Hawaiian Islands whatsoever, save and
excepting only such rights and privileges as belong to me in common
with all private citizens of, or residents in the Republic of
Hawaii.
Third. I do hereby
respectfully implore for such misguided Hawaiians and others as have
been concerned in the late rebellion against the Republic of Hawaii,
such degree of executive clemency as the Government may deem to be
consistent with its duty to the community, and such as a due regard
for its violated laws may permit.
Fourth. It is my
sincere desire henceforth to live in absolute privacy and retirement
from all publicity, or even appearance of being concerned in the
public affairs of the Hawaiian islands. further than to express, as
I now do and shall always continue to do, my most sincere hope for
the welfare and prosperity of its people, under and subject to the
Government of the Republic
of Hawaii.
Fifth. I hereby
offer and present my duly certified oath of allegiance to the
Republic of Hawaii.
Sixth. I have
caused the foregoing statement to be prepared and drawn, and have
signed the same without having received the slightest suggestion
from the President of Hawaii, or from any member of the Government
of Hawaii, concerning the same or any part thereof, or concerning
any action or course of my own in the premises.
Relying upon the
magnanimity of the Government of the Republic, and upon its
protection.
I have the honor to
be, Mr. President,
Very respectfully,
Your most obedient servant,
(Signed)
LILIUOKALANI DOMINIS
On the 24th day of
January, A. D. 1895, the foregoing was in our presence read over and
considered carefully and deliberately by Liliuokalani Dominis, and she,
the said Liliuokalani Dominis, thereupon in our presence declared that
the same was a correct, exact and full statement of her wishes and acts
in the premises, which statement she declared to us that she desired to
sign and acknowledge in our presence as her own free act and deed, and
she thereupon signed the same in our presence, and declared the same to
be her free act and deed, in witness whereof we have at the request of
the said Liliuokalani Dominis, and in her presence, hereunto subscribed
our names is attesting witnesses, at the Executive building, in Honolulu
on the Island of Oahu, this '24th day of January, A. D. 1893.
(Signed), WM.
G. IRWIN,
H. A. WlDEMANN,
SAMUEL PARKER
J. KALUA
KAHOOKANO
C. B. WILSON,
PAUL NEUMANN
HONOLULU,
ISLAND OF OAHU
On this 24th day of
January, A. D. 1895, personally appeared before me, LILIUOKALANI
DOMINIS known to me to be the person described in and who executed
the foregoing instrument, who acknowledged to me that she executed
the same freely and voluntarily and for the uses and purposes
therein set forth.
W. L. STANLEY,
Notary Public.
HONOLULU,
ISLAND OF OAHU, HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
I, Liliuokalani
Dominis, do solemnly swear in the presence of Almighty God, that I
will support the Constitution, Laws and Government of the Republic
of Hawaii, and will not, either directly or indirectly, encourage or
assist in the restoration or establishment of a monarchical form of
government in the Hawaiian Islands.
(Signed) W.
L. STANLEY, Notary Public
The effect of this
letter of abdication was not as sensational as might be anticipated at
first thought. In fact the move came about two years too late to attract
extraordinary attention. In the eyes of the Government, this lady was in
much the same position as a private citizen who had communicated to them
concerning a change of opinion in politics. With the people, her
undoubted knowledge of the plot of the proposed revolution and her
"abdication" being forthcoming only when she found herself hemmed in
from every side, gave her scant sympathy, consequently this belated
action did not inspire the confidence in the honest intention of the
move which would have resulted, had it been made at an earlier day.
The Executive submitted
the letter to the Advisory Councils and later made the following reply:
EXECUTIVE BUILDING,
HONOLULU, January 29, 1895
To MRS.
LlLIUOKALANI DOMINIS
MADAM: A document
executed by you purporting to contain an abdication and renunciation
of all sovereign rights heretofore claimed by you has been delivered
on your behalf to the President.
As you were under
arrest at the time this instrument was signed it is desired before
accepting and placing the same on file, to make clear to you, in
order that no misunderstanding may hereafter arise, the views of the
Government in this matter:
1. The execution of
this document cannot be taken to exempt you in the slightest degree
from personal and individual liability for such complicity as due
investigation and trial may show that you had in the late conspiracy
against the Government and the consequent loss of life; which
position is recognized by you in your letter.
2. It cannot be
conceded that such rights and claims as you now voluntarily
relinquish have had any legal existence since January 14, 1893, when
by your public announcement that you no longer considered yourself
bound by the fundamental law of the land under which you took
office, and by your acts in attempting by the mere exercise of your
own will to establish a new system of government, the contract
existing between you and the people was dissolved, and all sovereign
rights theretofore vested in you were lost. The statement by members
of your then cabinet that they could not control your proposed
action, and their appeal to citizens of Honolulu for assistance, was
the next step which led to a resumption by the people of the rights
of government.
3. So far as your
communication may be taken as a. notice to the disaffected that it
is your desire that the Republic shall be recognized by them as the
sole and lawful government of the country, it is fully appreciated.
In this connection your unselfish appeal for clemency for those who
took part in the late insurrection will receive full consideration.
(Signed)
WILLIAM O. SMITH, Attorney-General
That there was a latent
hope that the letter of abdication would influence the government to act
with leniency toward the political offenders, and the ex-Queen in
particular seems highly probable. Liliuokalani had, however, been given
the opportunity to retire to private life and live quietly and
comfortably among her people. This opportunity had been set aside, and
not until, balked on every hand in her attempts to regain her throne,
did she come to realize how sweet was the freedom which she had
forfeited.
Whatever hope may have
existed in her mind was ill-founded, however. On Tuesday, February 5th.
Liliuokalani Dominis was brought before the Military Commission charged
with Misprison of Treason. The trial which occupied the greater part of
four days was marked by sharp legal sparring and a flood of objections
from the attorney for the defense. Among the principal witnesses against
the ex-Queen were Samuel Nowlein and Charles Clark, both of whom had
been "hangers on" about Washington Place
since 1893, also William Kaae, who had acted as private secretary to
Liliuokalani. Nowlein testified to having had charge of the arms and
dynamite bombs and making arrangements to station guards about the place
on the night of the outbreak. Clark had been in charge of the place
during Nowlein's absence and informed Liliuokalani of the progress of
the movements in the city, Kaae, the private secretary, testified to
having drawn up the Commissions for the Cabinet officers of the new
government, as follows:
R. W. WILCOX, Minister
Foreign Affairs
SAM NOWLEIN, Minister of Interior
CHARLES T. GULICK,
Minister of Finance
C. W. ASHFORD,
Attorney-General.
ANTONE ROSA and V. V.
ASHFORD, Associate Justices
GOVERNORS:
A. S. CLEGHORN, Oahu
JOSEPH NAWAHI, Hawaii
D.
KAWANANAKOA, Maui
J. KALANIANAOLE, Kauai
W. H. RICKARD, Marshal
That these Commissions
were signed by the ex-Queen was further proven by the entry in her
private diary December 28th: "Signed eleven Commissions today." Kaae had
written out the forms for the Commissions, proclamations and the new
Constitution, under the direction of C. T. Gulick and the ex-Queen. On
Thursday, the third day of the trial, the defense submitted the
following statement notwithstanding Liliuokalani had gone on the stand
and made denial of any knowledge whatsoever of an attempt to restore her
to the throne.
The statement was
inspired by her legal adviser and was undoubtedly prepared with a view
to strengthening the ex-Queen's case, not so much with the Military
Commission as with the people abroad. Among her own people this
statement tended to wipe out what conciliatory feeling her formal
abdication may have engendered. The statement is given in full:
"In the year 1893,
on the 15th day of January, at the request of a large majority of
the Hawaiian people, and by and with the advice and consent of my
Cabinet, I proposed to make certain changes in the Hawaiian Kingdom,
which were suggested to me as being for the advantage and benefit of
the Kingdom and subjects and residents thereof. These proposed
changes did not deprive foreigners of any rights or privileges
enjoyed by them under the Constitution of 1887, promulgated by King
Kalakaua and his Cabinet, without the consent of the people or
ratified by their votes.
"My Ministers at
the last moment changed their views and requested me to defer all
action in connection to the Constitution, and I yielded to their
advice as bound to do by the existing Constitution and Laws.
"A minority of the
foreign population made my action the pretext for overthrowing the
Monarchy, and aided by the United States Naval forces and
representative established a, new government.
"I owed no
allegiance to the Provisional Government so established, nor to any
power or to any one save the will of my people and the welfare of my
country.
"The wishes of my
people were not consulted as to this change of government, and only
those who were in practical rebellion against the Constitutional
Government were allowed to vote upon the question whether the
Monarchy should exist or not.
"To prevent the
shedding of blood of my people, natives and foreigners alike, I
opposed armed interference and quietly yielded to the armed forces
brought against my throne, and submitted to the arbitrament of the
Government of the United States the decision of my rights and those
of the Hawaiian people. Since then, as is well known to all, I have
pursued the path of peace and diplomatic discretion, and not that of
internal strife.
"The United States
having first interfered in the interest of those founding the
Government of 1893 upon the basis of revolution, concluded to leave
to the Hawaiian people the selection of their own form of
government.
"This selection was
anticipated and prevented by the Provisional Government, who, being
possessed of the military and police power of the Kingdom, so
cramped the electorial privileges that no free expression of their
will was permitted to the people who were opposed to them.
"By my command and
advice the native people and those in sympathy with them were
restrained from rising against the government in power. The movement
undertaken by the Hawaiians last month was absolutely commenced
without my knowledge, sanction, consent or assistance, directly or
indirectly, and this fact is in truth well known to those who took
part in it. I received no information from any one in regard to arms
which were procured or which were to be procured, nor of any men who
were induced, or to be induced to join in any such uprising. I do
not know why this information should have been withheld from me,
unless it was with a view to my personal safety or as a
precautionary measure. It would not have received my sanction, and I
can assure the gentlemen of this Commission that, had I known of any
such intention, I would have dissuaded the promoters from such a
venture. But I will add, that had I known, their secrets would have
been mine and inviolately preserved.
"That I intended to
change my Cabinet and appoint certain officers of the Kingdom, in
the event of my restoration, I will admit; but that I, or any one
known to me, had, in part or in whole, established a new government
is not true. Before the 24th of January, 1895, the day upon which I
formally abdicated and called upon my people to recognize the
Republic of Hawaii as the only lawful Government of these Islands,
and to support that Government, I claim that I had a right to select
a Cabinet in anticipation of a possibility, and history of other
governments support this right. I was not intimidated into
abdication, but followed the counsel of able and generous friends
and well-wishers who advised me that such an act would restore peace
and good will among my people; vitalize the progress and prosperity
of the Islands and induce the actual Government to deal leniently,
mercifully and charitably, impassionately with those who resorted to
arms for the purpose of displacing a government in the formation of
which they had no voice or control; and which they themselves had
seen established by force of arms.
"I acted of my own
free will and wish the world to know that I have asked no immunity
of favor myself nor pleaded my abdication as a petition for mercy.
My actions were dictated by the sole aim of doing good to my beloved
country, and of alleviating the positions and pains of those who
unhappily and unwisely resorted to arms to regain an independence,
which they thought had been unjustly wrested from them.
"As you deal with
them, so I pray that the Almighty God may deal with you in your
hours of trial. To my regret much has been said about the danger
which threatened foreign women, and children, and about the
blood-thirstiness of the Hawaiians and the outrages which would have
been perpetrated by them if they had succeeded in their attempt to
overthrow the Republic Government.
"They, who know the
Hawaiian temper and disposition, understand that there was no
foundation for any such fears. The behavior of the rebels to those
foreigners whom they captured and held shows that there was no
malignancy in the hearts of the Hawaiians at all. It would have been
sad indeed if the doctrine of the Christian Missionary Fathers,
taught to my people by them and those who succeeded them, should
have fallen like the seed in the parable upon barren ground.
"I must deny your
right to try me in the manner and by the Court which you have called
together for this purpose. In your actions you violate your own
Constitution and laws, which are now the Constitution and laws of
the land. There may be in your consciences a warrant for your
action, in what you may deem a necessity of the times, but you
cannot find any such warrant for any such action in any settled,
civilized or Christian land. All who uphold you in this unlawful
proceeding may scorn and despise my word, but the offense of
breaking and setting aside for a specific purpose the laws of your
own nation and disregarding all justice and fairness may be to them
and to you the source of an unhappy and much to be regretted legacy.
"I would ask you to
consider that your government is on trial before, the whole
civilized world, and that in accordance with your actions and
decisions will you yourselves be judged.
"The happiness and
prosperity of Hawaii are henceforth in your hands alone as its
rulers. You are commencing a new era in its history. May the Divine
Providence grant you the wisdom to lead the nation into paths of
forbearance, forgiveness and peace, and to create and consolidate a
united people ever-anxious to advance in the way of civilization
outlined by the American fathers of liberty and religion.
"In concluding my
statement I thank you for the courtesy you have shown to me, not as
your former Queen, but as an humble citizen of this land and as a
woman. I assure you, who faithfully believe that you are fulfilling
a public duty, that I will never harbor any resentment or cherish
any ill feeling towards you whatever may be your decision."
At the opening of the
trial on Friday morning, Counsel Newmann was informed by the Commission
that the following portions of his client's statement must be stricken
out:
"A minority of the
foreign population made my action the pretext for overthrowing the
monarchy, and, aided by the United States naval forces and
representative established a new government."
"I owed no
allegiance to the Provisional Government so established, nor to any
power, or to anyone save the will of my people and the welfare of my
country."
"And only those who
were in practical rebellion against the constitutional government."
"All who uphold you
in this unlawful proceeding may scorn and despise my word; but the
offense of breaking and setting aside for a, specific purpose the
laws of your own nation, and disregarding all justice and fairness,
may be to them and to you the source of an unhappy and much to be
regretted legacy."
"The United States
having first interfered in the interest of those founding the
government of 1893 upon the basis of revolution concluded to leave
to the Hawaiian people the selection of their own form of
government."
" This selection
was anticipated and prevented by the Provisional Government, who,
being possessed of the military and police power of the kingdom, so
cramped the electoral privileges that no free expression of their
will was permitted to the people who were opposed to them."
Objection was made, and
overruled, to any section being stricken out without rejecting the whole
statement. The arguments of the counsel for defense and the
Judge-Advocate occupied the greater part of the closing day of the
trial. The argument of Captain Kinney was one of the master efforts of
the trial, in which the fallacies of the ex-Queen's statement were
pointed out and the evidence of a desire to create sympathy, on account
of alleged injuries, not only among her own people but among the
citizens of foreign countries. The trial closed on the afternoon of
February 7th, and the ex-Queen was returned to her apartments in the
Executive building where she remained under military guard until allowed
to return to her Washington Place
resident on parole pardon.
CHAPTER 4
Landing Arms And
General Scheme Of Rebel Plot
On December 3d, 1894,
Major Win. H. Seward returned from San Francisco where he had arranged
for the purchase of the arms for the revolutionists and their shipment
to the Islands on the schooner H. C. Wahlberg Capt. Mathew Martin
commanding.
Where the funds for the
purchase of the arms came from was not brought out during the trials. It
is highly probable that the money was obtained by an assessment on the
members of the royalist party who were either directly or indirectly
interested in the success of the revolt.
Immediately after the
arrival of Seward arrangements were made to receive and conceal the arms
until they could be distributed among the natives. The men picked to
take charge of the natives employed in this work were George Townsend
and Charlie Warren a native. These men were stationed on the windward
side of the island near Makapuu point. The schooner was sighted on
December 19th, and after landing the revolvers and a portion of the
ammunition on Rabbit island, again put to sea, where the remainder of
the munitions of war were to be transferred to the steamer Waimanalo,
Capt. Davis commanding, and brought into the harbor of Honolulu. The
revolvers were hurried in the sands on Rabbit island and later brought
to Honolulu by natives and distributed among those who were to take part
in the uprising.
Captain Davis was
engaged by W. H. Rickard and was promised a reward of $10,000, if the
arms were successfully landed. The transfer of rifles and ammunition
from the schooner to the Waimanalo was made on New Years day some twenty
miles off Rabbit island. After going to the island to give notice that
the arms had been secured, the steamer put to sea, and arrived off
Diamond Head on the evening of the second of January. W. H. Rickard went
on board, and the steamer again put to sea, it being the intention to
land the arms at points along the water front of Honolulu and begin the
fight on the night of January 3d. Arriving again off Diamond Head, the evening of the third, word was sent to the steamer that
the men gathered at Kakaako to receive the arms had been discovered and
the steamer cargo must be landed near Diamond Head.
This was accordingly done, and the arms buried in the sand on the beach
beyond Diamond Head.
The original plan of
attack was for the arms to be landed at Kakaako, and at the fish market
both places being on the city water front. The fighting was to begin
immediately. White men in the city were to lead the natives, capture the
station house, electric light station and telephone offices, establish
posts at the junction of the streets and prevent the Citizens Guard and
members of the volunteer companies from reaching their places of
rendezvous. The landing on the water front having been prevented, the
time for the attack was set for 2 o'clock Monday morning, January 7th.
Nowlein was to march
upon the city from Waikiki; simultaneously with his movement, bands of natives led by
whites were to come in from other points in the outskirts, and these
parties were to be joined by natives and white royalists living in the
city, and combine in a general assault upon the Government building. The
surprise of Sunday night had of course disconcerted the leaders. The
white royalists who were to have joined in the fight kept as quiet as
possible, and made every attempt to clear their skirts of any semblance
of having been associated with the affair in any way. The freedom with
which liquor was dealt out to the natives, the lack of anything
approaching organization in their ranks, the proposed use of dynamite
bombs, and the ignorance of the natives of the use of fire arms all went
to prove that, had the rebels reached the city before the government
forces were able to rendezvous the morning of January 7th, 1895,
would have been characterized indiscriminate slaughter in the streets of
Honolulu.
CHAPTER 5
Forcible And Voluntary
Deportation Of Exiles
In the forcible
deportation of J. Cranstoun, A. E. Meuller and J. B. Johnstone on
Saturday, February 2nd, the Government made an arbitrary move which met
with considerable adverse criticism, not because it was believed that
the character of the men did not justify the act, but rather on account
of the danger of serious diplomatic complications arising from the
expulsion from the country without trial. The three men had been
arrested during the early days of the outbreak for being parties to the
plan to destroy public buildings with dynamite.
Johnstone had been in
the employ of the Government as a detective, at the same time being hand
in glove with those interested in upsetting the Republic. None of the
men held any considerable amount of a property and might well be classed
in the floating population of the country. On Friday these prisoners
were removed from the prison to the station house, and about noon
Saturday they were put on board the steamer Warrimoo of the Canadian
Australian line. All three protested against their treatment and asked
to see their national representatives.
Johnstone was of
English birth, Mueller, German, and Craustoun claimed to be an American
citizen by naturalization. The American Minister strove to impress upon
the Government officials that they were making a great mistake by their
arbitrary action but under advice of their foreign representatives, the
German and Englishmen were inclined to accept the inevitable. The
officers of the Government remained firm and having put the men on the
steamer kept them there guarded by police until the vessel was well
outside the harbor. On arrival in British Columbia, the exiles brought
suit for damages against the steamship line for conveying them out of
the country.
The cases of Cranstoun
and Mueller are now going through the usual processes of law in the
court of Victoria, B. C. Johnstone's claim has been withdrawn to await
the verdict of the court in the cases of his brother exiles. Claims for
damages were also filed with the home Governments, but none of the
latter claims have been pressed up to the present time.
The position of the
Hawaiian Government in the deportation of Cranstoun, Mueller and
Johnstone is defined as follows in a memorandum of the law, given by
General A. S. Hartwell to William A. Kinney who was retained as counsel
by the Government:
In re Cranstoun, Muller
and Johnstone, exiled from the Hawaiian Islands by order of President
Dole, acting as Commander-in-chief of the national forces of Hawaii,
during the prevalence of martial law upon the Island of Oahu
of the Republic of Hawaii upon suspicion based upon facts known to the
Hawaiian Government, that they were persons dangerous to the community,
and implicated in the rebellion against the Government.
"The facts on which
these persons were considered to he dangerous persons and implicated
in the rebellion, can be shown by affidavits. Such showing removes
all doubt that their expulsion from the Hawaiian Islands was based
upon public reasons and not from any malicious motives.
"The position and
claim of the Hawaiian Government is that there is no treaty
obligation precluding the expulsion from the country of any persons
of any nationality, whenever martial law is in force, and in the
opinion of the Government such persons have violated the laws of the
Republic, or have become implicated in any plot, conspiracy or
treason against the Government.
''The Government,
in order to exercise its rights under martial law and protect the
community in times of actual rebellion, is not required to try and
condemn such persons prior to their expulsion, but is the sole
judge, not only of the necessity or propriety of declaring martial
law, and placing the country or any part of it under martial law,
but of the course to be taken in respect of persons who in its
opinion are unsafe persons to be allowed to remain within the
country."
Voluntary Exiles
When the Military
Commission had completed the trial of the more prominent participants in
the rebellion, the desire of many citizens of the Republic to have
severe punishment meted out to each and every prisoner began to cool.
Those who were calling for the lives of the rebels at the outset were
quite satisfied with deportation, light imprisonment or unrestricted
release of those remaining. Rather than continue the trials until all
those in prison had been dealt with, the Government gave many of the
prisoners the option of leaving the country or going before the
Commission. Most of those remaining were white residents to whom the
prison life was, naturally enough, decidedly distasteful. They were
totally in the dark as to the evidence which the Government could bring
in at the trial, and rather than run the chances of continued
imprisonment a good proportion were glad to escape by leaving the
country. Each one accepting this option signed a statement similar to
the following, which act, British Commissioner Hawes stated to the
English subjects in the presence of the Marshal, "was a practical
admission of guilt:"
"Whereas, I, __, am now
held in confinement for complicity in the recent insurrection against
the Hawaiian Government, and have expressed a desire to leave the
country not to return, provided said Government shall in its clemency
consent to such expatriation, now, therefore I, the said in
consideration of the Hawaiian Government, immediately upon being
released, it being understood and agreed by me that said charge is no
wise withdrawn nor in any sense discontinued, do hereby agree that when
allowed to leave the custody of the Marshal, I shall and will leave the
Hawaiian Islands
by the leaving Honolulu for February, 1895, and will not return during
my life time without the written consent of the Minister of Foreign
Affairs or other officer having charge of said department, approved by
the Marshal."
The men who took this
option were as follows: L. J. Levey, Fred. Harrison, George Ritman, John
C. White, P. M. Rooney, Fred. H. Redward, Frank Honeck, Charles
Creigliton, Arthur White, Arthur McDowall, A. Carriane, Fred. W.
Wundenburg, Michael Cole Bailey, C. W. Ashford, C. Klemme, Harry von
Werthern, John Kadin, James Brown, A. P. Peterson, P. G. Camarinos and
Nichols Peterson. These men were released about a week before their
departure so as to give them an opportunity to put their business
affairs in order. The first lot of eleven went to San Francisco on the steamer Australia, February 23,
and the others followed during the next month, with the exception of one
or two whose homes were in Australia.
Later in the year V. V.
Ashford, Louis Marshal and W. H. C. Greig who had been sentenced by the
military court were released from prison on condition that they leave
the country. With the exception of these three together with C. W.
Ashford, Cranstoun, Mueller and Johnstone, all those deported were
granted leave to return to the country before the end of the year.
CHAPTER 6
Pardon Of Prisoners
It was hardly two
months after the Military Commission held its final session when a
movement was set on foot to influence the President and his advisers to
exercise their prerogative and grant pardons to the political prisoners.
The plea was first made by former royalist leaders and, in consequence
of the apparent disposition of former enemies of the Government to
accept the political situation, received not a little support from many
who had stood by the Republic from its inception. It was also argued
that such a course would conciliate the native population, and create a
more united people.
The quiet condition of
the community lent force to the plea for clemency and on the Fourth of
July, 1895, almost six months after the fight in which Charles Carter
was killed, forty-five of the "rank and file" of the natives
incarcerated in consequence of their connection with the rebellion, were
granted conditional pardons. Each and every pardon contained the
following provisions: "Such sentence is suspended, and the said may go
at large, subject to remand upon the order of the President."
On the same day the
sentences of the leaders were commuted as follows: W. H. C. Greig, from
twenty to fifteen years; T. B. Walker, thirty to fifteen years; Carl
Widemann, thirty to fifteen years; Louis Marshall, twenty to fifteen
years; W. H. Seward, thirty to twenty years; W. H. Rickard, thirty to
twenty years; R. W. Wilcox, thirty to twenty years; and C. T. Gulick,
thirty to twenty years.
In granting these
pardons members of the Executive endeavored to impress upon those who
had been released that upon their good behavior after obtaining their
liberty depended the attitude of the Government toward the leaders of
the revolt, who remained in prison.
It was not many weeks
after this first act of clemency that the advocates of general pardon
began to make themselves heard. The effect abroad, the strength of the
Republic, its ability to maintain itself against all foes, and the
conciliatory effect of such a move were the leading arguments presented.
Those who opposed the general pardon held that such a move would be a
practical admission that the insurrection itself, the "war" for its
suppression, the lengthy continuance of martial law, the extended
sessions of the military court with its extreme sentences were all in
the nature of a farce and would place the officers of the Government as
the leading lights in an opera bouffe.
In the face of
arguments pro and con the Government held to its original policy of
granting conditional pardons according as the peaceful condition of the
country gave evidence that political leaders had deserted the policy of
attempting to gain their ends by force of arms. Accordingly on the 5th
of September the President and Cabinet went before the Council of State
with the recommendation that conditional pardons be granted ex-Queen
Liliuokalani, Carl Widemann, Prince "Cupid" and forty-six others. The
recommendation received the sanction of the Council of State, and on
Friday, September 7th, the prisoners named were released. In releasing
the ex-Queen the Government made the extra condition that she reside at
Washington Place and not change her residence without permission from
the Government; also that she attend no political gatherings nor hold
political meetings at her house. Some months later the Government gave
the ex-Queen permission to reside anywhere on the Island of Oahu that
suited her pleasure.
As Thanksgiving Day
approached the friends of the remaining prisoners renewed their efforts
to secure the release of the leaders who 'of all those sentenced by the
Military Commission were the only ones remaining within the prison
walls. Petitions for pardons signed by Hawaiians and foreigners were
placed before the President and letters were received from the men in
prison in which they admitted their connection with the rebellion,
expressed regret for their political mistakes and signified their
willingness to take the oath to the Republic, and be numbered among its
supporters.
The petitions with the
recommendations of the Executive were placed before the Council of State
and as a result, on the 28th of November W. H. Rickard, T. B. Walker,
and five natives were released from prison upon the same conditions as
previous pardons had been granted. There now remained in prison but
eight of the men who took part, directly or otherwise, in the revolt.
Among this number were R. W. Wilcox, C. T. Gulick, W. H. Seward and J.
F. Bowler.
After having released
men quite as seriously implicated in the revolt as those who remained in
prison, the people of the country were unanimously in favor of the
Government making a clean sweep and allowing all the prisoners to go
free. The Executive waited, however, until January 1, 1896, when the last prisoners, leaders and all, who had been
sentenced by the Military Court
were released from prison and allowed to go and come at their pleasure
within the country, provided they kept free from political alliances
made with a view to attempting the overthrow of the established
Government.
This magnanimous policy
of the Government toward its former enemies was generally applauded
abroad and was received with more or less favor at home, although many
of the staunch supporters of the Government believed it the final act of
placing the stamp of farcial procedure upon the work of the Military
Commission. As to the good or evil effects of the action of the
Government upon the peculiar political conditions of Hawaii, time alone
will demonstrate. If void of any other results, this action and the fact
that it was sanctioned by a good proportion of the men who shouldered
guns in support of the Government, shows with what readiness the people
of Hawaii forget political differences even though those differences
call for the defense of principle by resort to armed force.
CHAPTER 7
Diplomatic
Complications
Immediately the Military Court
closed its sessions, the foreigners who had been arrested during martial
law began to lay plans for obtaining indemnity for what they considered
unjust imprisonment. Some of these men had been sentenced by the court
but the larger proportion of claimants was among those who had accepted
the option of leaving the country and still others who had been arrested
during the early days of the revolt and detained in prison until the
excited condition of the community had subsided.
The enemies of the
Government were quite jubilant over the prospect for a time as it was
believed that these claims would result in serious diplomatic
complications and condemning the action of the Republic by foreign
powers.
The first claims to be
heard from by the Government were those of W. H. Rickard and T. B.
Walker. These men, of British birth, gave affidavits that they had not
become naturalized citizens of Hawaii notwithstanding they had exercised
full rights of citizenship and held public office under the monarchy.
This claim was regarded by Hawaiian officials as preposterous and upon
searching the records it was found that both Walker and Rickard had
taken out Hawaiian letters of naturalization. These facts were placed
before the British Government and early in August British Commissioner
Hawes informed Minister Hatch that the British Government recognized the
claim of the Republic as to the citizenship of Rickard and Walker, hence
the British Government had no interest in them.
At the request of the
British Commissioner his Government had been supplied with the evidence
taken at the military trials. Early in August another request was made
calling upon the Hawaiian Government to set aside the verdict of the
Military Court in the case of V. V. Ashford. The British Government
admitted the validity of the court, also that the trials were conducted
in an impartial manner. It was held, however, that Mr. Ashford had been
convicted upon the evidence of an accomplice, hence the request. The
Hawaiian Government took the matter under advisement and up to July 1,
1896, it was still a subject for diplomatic correspondence.
Of those claiming the
protection of the British Government who did not appear before the
Military Court the following have presented claims that have been brought
to the attention of the Hawaiian Government: C. W. Ashford, Fred
Harrison, G. Carson Kenyon, Lewis J. Levey, A. McDowall, F. H. Redward,
W. I. Reynolds, T. W. Rawlins, E. B. Thomas, M. C. Bailey, and Charles
E. Dunwell. Of other nationalities, George Lyeurgus and P. G. Camarinos,
citizens of
Greece, Edmund Norrie, a Dane, Manoel Gil dos Reis, Portuguese. James
Durrell and George L. Ritman, Jr., Americans, have lodged claims for
indemnity. The demands of the Grecian Government have been made through
Great Britain.
The first case to be
urged by the United States was that of James Durrell, an American negro
who had been arrested for endeavoring to incite Portuguese to join the
ranks of the insurgents. As a result of Durrell's application to his
Government the following extraordinary communication was received by the
Minister of Foreign Affairs:
Legation of the
United States,
Honolulu, July 21, 1895
HON. F. M. HATCH, Minister of Foreign Affairs.
Sir: I have the
honor to enclose herewith a copy of the affidavit of James Durrell,
from which it appears Durrell was born in the State of Louisiana in
1858, and resided in the United States until September, 1894. He
then came to this city and obtained temporary employment as a cook
at the Arlington Hotel. On November 8, 1894, he purchased the lease
and good-will of a cigar store, soda water and fruit stand, and
gradually built up a lucrative business. On the 9th of January last,
while quietly seated in his store, he was arrested without
explanation or information of any charge against him, confined in
jail on common prison fare until the 27th of February following, a
period of seven weeks, and then discharged without any trial,
charges, explanation or opportunity of defense; nor has he, since
his release, been informed of the cause of his arrest.
He declares that he
has never by word or deed forfeited his allegiance to or right of
protection by his government; that he has neither done nor spoken
anything directly or indirectly against the Government of Hawaii or
its laws; that he has never expressed sentiments antagonistic to
that Government, or in any manner counselled, encouraged, aided or
abetted its enemies, either in armed rebellion or secret plotting;
and that he never possessed any information which under existing
laws it was his duty to report to your Government.
These statements
establish, in the opinion of the President of the United States, a
prima facie claim for substantial indemnity from the Hawaiian
Government to Mr. Durrell.
I am instructed,
therefore, to bring this case to the attention of the Hawaiian
authorities, leaving no doubt in their minds of the confidence felt
in Washington ''that the Government of Hawaii will not refuse to
tender adequate reparation to this injured citizen of the United
States, nor hesitate to take prompt measures to exonerate him from
the imputation which this arbitrary treatment has left upon his good
name."
With sentiments of
high esteem,
I am, Sir, very
respectfully,
ALBERT S.
WILLIS, E. E. & M. P., U. S. A.
The general tenor of
this letter, the demand being made before a statement from the Hawaiian
Government had been obtained was regarded by the people at large as
another evidence of President Cleveland's wholesome dislike for the
Republic. The Government, however, took the matter under advisement,
made a thorough investigation in order to ascertain the strength of the
"prima facie claim" and the case is still the subject of diplomatic
correspondence. In fact the evidence taken by the Government in all the
cases against those who lodged claims, has been forwarded to the
respective governments that have taken up the cause of their injured
citizens.
Further evidence of the
apparently unfriendly attitude of the United States was found in the
release of the schooner Wahlberg, by order of the Secretary of State.
The Hawaiian Government held that the act of this American ship
conveying the arms to Hawaii for the overthrow of the Republic, was in
direct violation of neutrality laws. The American Government took no
notice of the claim and released the captain and his ship from custody,
notwithstanding the Hawaiian Government had sent an attorney and
witnesses to San Diego to aid the prosecution of the case.
Great Britain
has pursued a less abrupt course, except possibly in the claim that the
verdict in the case of V. V. Ashford should be set aside. The
correspondence in this case has not been made public although it is
generally understood among the supporters of the Government that the
executive officials of the country will not attempt to set aside the
action of a court the validity of whose formation and subsequent action
has been accepted by Great Britain
and upheld by the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of Hawaii.
The validity of the
Military Commission was brought to test before the Supreme Court of the
Hawaiian Islands through habeas corpus proceedings to secure the release
of J. C. Kalanianaole, "Prince Cupid," convicted of misprision of
treason and sentenced to one year's imprisonment at hard labor and to
pay a fine of one thousand dollars. The petition was filed May 20, 1895 and the case was argued before the full bench, Chief Justice
Judd and Justices Bickerton and Frear, at the special May Term. Paul
Neumann appeared for the petitioner and A. S. Hartwell and Lorrin A.
Thurston for respondent. No sufficient ground being shown for the
discharge of the petitioner he was remanded to the custody of the
Government.
The briefs of counsel
together with the decision of the court by Justice Frear have been
published in book form. The syllabus of the court decision is given as
follows:
"Under Article 31
of the Constitution, which provides that the President may, in case
of rebellion or invasion, or imminent danger thereof, place the
whole or any part of the Republic under martial law, the President
alone is to decide whether the exigency is such as to require
martial law, and how long martial law when proclaimed shall continue
in force; and his decision is not subject to review by the courts.
"Under martial law,
in case of insurrection, the military commander may do whatever, in
accordance with the customs and usages of war, he may deem necessary
or proper for the suppression of the insurrection and the
restoration of peace, and his acts cannot be called in question by
the courts except in case of an abuse of power.
"Under martial law,
if necessary, in the opinion of the military commander, for the
restoration of peace, a civilian may be tried by a military
commission for misprision of treason.
"Such trial may
take place after actual hostilities have ceased and while the civil
courts are in session, if there is still a state of war, and an
impediment to such trials in the civil courts.
"Misprision of
treason, if committed, is not necessarily completed before an actual
outbreak or the proclamation of martial law.
"Notwithstanding a
reservation in a proclamation of martial law that the civil courts
would continue to conduct ordinary business, a person may, if
necessary in the opinion of the President, be tried by a military
commission.
"The President may
delegate to a Judge Advocate the power to bring a person before a
military commission for trial."
Shortly after the close
of the Military Commission's work the Executive and Advisory Councils
passed an Indemnity Act and other laws relating to judicial
investigation of claims against the government, sedition and to "persons
having certain lawless intentions." These were passed without a
dissenting vote and were duly signed by the President.
|
|